Sager NP5797 Benchmarks and Scores with GTX280M

Justin@XoticPC · 04-07-2009, 03:59 PM

Here are some scores from the NP5797 with GTX 280M

STOCK

OC'd with Extreme QX9300

I have attached a Zip File in addition to the scores posted above with FarCry 2 Runs.

Run 1 was High Settings
Run 2 was Very High Settings
Run 3 was Ultra Settings

All at 1920x1200 OC'd

shiva.nf · 04-07-2009, 05:28 PM

Very much similar to Asus w90. This one roocks in Medium settings for Crysis whereas W90 is doing slightly better in Very High settings. Now it confuses me again

shiva.nf · 04-07-2009, 05:30 PM

Looks like there is absolutely no difference in processor speed for Crysis benchmarking, whereas there was an increase in fps for ASUS W90 when the processor is overclocked

shiva.nf · 04-07-2009, 08:42 PM

Justin,

The processor is being shown as QX9300 (Core 2 ExtremeP??

shiva.nf · 04-07-2009, 11:41 PM

I meant both the stock bench mark and the other one, the cpu is being displayed as Core 2 extreme

Justin@XoticPC · 04-08-2009, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiva.nf

Justin,

The processor is being shown as QX9300 (Core 2 ExtremeP??

Yes it is the QX9300.

Trias · 04-08-2009, 08:18 AM

ya, i think you posted the wrong image for the stock processor benchmarks...as it is also showing the qx9300...i'm very interested in seeing the stock image as i'm going to be making my order next Friday with a dual core unless there is an extreme difference, then ill spend the extra cash on the 9300

jupapri · 04-08-2009, 11:00 PM

This Computer rocks. ati sucks poor driver support. i dont play 3d mark i like more fps not 3dmark scores.

The Way its nvidia

shiva.nf · 04-09-2009, 01:44 PM

I've finally ordered 5797. Now waiting for it

Justin_W@XoticPC · 04-09-2009, 02:56 PM

Congrats on your purchase Shiva!

04-09-2009, 02:56 PM	#10
Justin_W@XoticPC XoticPC Employee Notebook Prophet Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Lincoln, NE Posts: 1,013 Rep Power: 26	Congrats on your purchase Shiva! __________________ Justin W Sales & Customer Service 1-877-289-9684 Ext. 515 justinw@xoticpc.com Feel free to call or email me with any questions

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-07-2009, 05:28 PM	#2
shiva.nf Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Rep Power: 0	Very much similar to Asus w90. This one roocks in Medium settings for Crysis whereas W90 is doing slightly better in Very High settings. Now it confuses me again

04-07-2009, 05:30 PM	#3
shiva.nf Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Rep Power: 0	Looks like there is absolutely no difference in processor speed for Crysis benchmarking, whereas there was an increase in fps for ASUS W90 when the processor is overclocked

04-07-2009, 08:42 PM	#4
shiva.nf Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Rep Power: 0	Justin, The processor is being shown as QX9300 (Core 2 ExtremeP??

04-07-2009, 11:41 PM	#5
shiva.nf Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Rep Power: 0	I meant both the stock bench mark and the other one, the cpu is being displayed as Core 2 extreme

04-08-2009, 08:18 AM	#7
Trias Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 29 Rep Power: 0	ya, i think you posted the wrong image for the stock processor benchmarks...as it is also showing the qx9300...i'm very interested in seeing the stock image as i'm going to be making my order next Friday with a dual core unless there is an extreme difference, then ill spend the extra cash on the 9300

04-08-2009, 11:00 PM	#8
jupapri Newbie Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 0	This Computer rocks. ati sucks poor driver support. i dont play 3d mark i like more fps not 3dmark scores. The Way its nvidia

04-09-2009, 01:44 PM	#9
shiva.nf Notebook Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Rep Power: 0	I've finally ordered 5797. Now waiting for it